Forum

General update
 
Notifications
Clear all

General update

2 Posts
1 Users
1 Reactions
746 Views
Posts: 20
Admin
Topic starter
(@matt8a9e50882c8)
Member
Joined: 2 years ago
[#5]

It has been 16 months since ISCET was formed, and as the last meeting was over two months ago, I thought this would be a good time to give an update on progress, particularly for those who have joined more recently.

HISTORY

The International Society for Clinical Eye Tracking (ISCET) was formed in March 2023 with overwhelming support from the clinical eye tracking community. The initial meeting was attended by 70 people from across the world. ISCET is an open forum for anyone with an interest in clinical eye tracking (defined as the use of eye trackers to inform patient diagnosis or management). ISCET’s goals, discussion topics and actions are decided by all who participate in meetings. The organising committee ( http://clinicaleyetracking.org/about ) exists to organise meetings, maintain the website, and ensure everyone’s views are represented. Meeting hosts rotate between three geographical regions (Asia/Australasia, Europe/Africa and The Americas) to maximise participation.

REMIT

Eye trackers have been used in a relatively small number of specialist clinics for decades, but as access to eye tracking technology improves and more clinicians seek to enter the field, there is a growing need for joined-up thinking to enable freedom of patient movement and avoid duplication of effort. ISCET’s members have set three goals for the society:

  1. Provide guidance and ‘default’ minimal protocols for conducting and analysing clinical eye tracking tasks. This will take the form of ‘ISCET standards’; similar to the ISCEV standards for visual electrophysiology that many clinicians will be familiar with. Ruth Hamilton (president of ISCEV) has provided immeasurable support to establishing ISCET. Standards are not meant to dictate how clinicians should do their work or replace common sense, but provide a minimal set of defaults suited to most situations (“all else being equal”). It is expected that different guidelines will be developed for each clinical condition (or groups of conditions where appropriate).
  2. Provide a unified voice for clinicians working with eye trackers. As a representative body, ISCET can (for example) push for clinical certification of eye tracking technology, as well as ‘fee codes’ to allow clinicians to claim for eye tracking tests.
  3. Maintain reference datasets. It can be difficult to determine whether a patient’s eye movement characteristics lie outside normative ranges without reference to large datasets. Although local/environmental factors undoubtedly affect measurements, published reference datasets from standardised protocols recorded in a wide range of settings should aid clinical decision-making.

RECENT AND ONGOING WORK

Rasha S Moustafa recently led a subcommittee which culminated last week in the presentation of two conference papers introducing ISCET at ETRA ‘24 ( https://doi.org/10.1145/3649902.3656357 and https://doi.org/10.1145/3649902.3655659 ).

Gemma Arblaster (University of Sheffield) is currently leading a subcommittee to roll out an international survey of clinical eye tracker usage. The aim is to reach clinicians working in any clinical fields that may involve eye tracking. The survey will be distributed to clinicians, professional bodies and manufacturers to provide a snapshot of the current state of clinical eye tracking globally. This in turn should enable ISCET to better understand the prevalence of eye trackers in various modes of practice and determine which clinical conditions to prioritise for standards development. Gemma will be in touch with the final wording of the survey before it goes live.

The next meeting will be held at a time to suit the Asia/Australasia region and is expected to focus on the early results of the survey study. Amanda Douglass (amanda.douglass@deakin.edu.au) will announce the date once the survey has launched. Please contact Amanda if you’d like to add anything to the agenda.

The mail group can be posted to by anybody. There is also now a website ( http://clinicaleyetracking.org ) with more information, where you can join the forum to hold a more targeted discussion on any issue you’d like to raise.

As ever, please share this with relevant colleagues who may not be aware of ISCET; the more people are involved, the more representative ISCET can be to various modes of clinical practice. The link to join this mail group is: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=ISCET .

All the best,

Matt


1 Reply
Posts: 20
Admin
Topic starter
(@matt8a9e50882c8)
Member
Joined: 2 years ago
Dear ISCET members and colleagues,
 
It has been 18 months since the last general update, and as we end 2025 with clinical guideline development now underway, this seems a good time to update on ISCET’s progress. The Society was formed to establish consensus on standardised clinical eye tracking protocols, to provide a unified voice for clinicians using the technology, and to enable data sharing to build normative/reference datasets. All of this should make it easier for new clinicians to enter the field and ultimately benefit patients. ISCET remains open to anyone with an interest in clinical uses of eye trackers, with all decisions being made through participation in our mailing list, forum and meetings.
 
In collaboration with ISCEV, ISCET is currently focused on defining protocols involved in the assessment of nystagmus. A dedicated working group has been established, with 27 contributors drawn from a wide range of clinical, technical and geographical backgrounds. While this is a relatively large group, the scale is intentional as its remit extends beyond nystagmus itself. In parallel with drafting guidelines, the group is working to define their scope and test decision-making processes that will underpin future ISCET guidelines. This includes deciding how guidelines will relate to one another. The group is provisionally adopting an ’eye movement systems’ approach, with the aim to define core guidelines for testing systems such as fixation, pursuit, saccades etc, which can be applied across a range of clinical conditions, which remains open to refinement as the guidelines development.
 
The progress to date reflects strong volunteer engagement and international collaboration across regions and clinical disciplines. It also marks a transition from organisational establishment to substantive standards development, which will directly support clinical practice. In recognition of this shift, the current Organising Committee, who have dedicated their time since ISCET’s inception, has agreed that all committee roles will be open to formal nomination once the first ISCET guideline has been published. Details on the nomination process and timeline will be shared with the membership as we approach publication of the first guideline.
 
Thank you to everyone who has contributed time and expertise through meetings, working groups and informal discussions; your participation continues to shape ISCET’s impact.
 
All the best,
Matt

Reply
Share: