Forum

Manuscript write-up…
 
Notifications
Clear all

Manuscript write-up discussion

7 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
1,625 Views
Posts: 21
Admin
Topic starter
(@matt8a9e50882c8)
Member
Joined: 3 years ago
[#4221]

Just following up after today’s meeting of the survey subcommittee. As promised, here is the template text used for recruiting to the survey. However, I should stress that this exact form of words was not used in every case.

Hello,

I am writing on behalf of the International Society for Clinical Eye Tracking (ISCET):  https://clinicaleyetracking.org/

We have developed a survey to help us understand how eye trackers are currently used in clinical practice and explore future clinical guideline development.

This survey can be completed by individuals involved in clinical eye tracking or other organisations (such as professional bodies, manufacturers or other stakeholders). We would like to gather as many individual responses as possible, so would appreciate you sharing this survey link with anyone who may be involved with eye tracking clinically. 

Please find a link to the survey here:  http://clinicaleyetracking.org/survey

If you require any further information, please contact Dr Gemma Arblaster and the ISCET survey working group (g.arblaster@sheffield.ac.uk)

Regards,

<…>


6 Replies
Posts: 8
(@gemma-arblaster)
Active Member
Joined: 2 years ago

Dear all,

Following our first writing meeting on Wed 17th Sept 2025 (3-4pm BST) I have proposed a follow up meeting time of:

Wed 15th Oct 10.30-11.30am BST.

Please accept / decline this calendar meeting invite to indicate your availability.

We will try to hold these writing meetings at a range of different times to suit other time zones. 

Please do continue to work on the draft manuscript.

Best wishes,

Gemma


Reply
Posts: 8
(@gemma-arblaster)
Active Member
Joined: 2 years ago

Dear all in the survey subcommittee,

 

The recording of the latest survey meeting should be on the ISCET website now. Please do continue to work on the survey manuscript draft.

 

The research questions that have been created are as follows:

1. How are eye trackers used clinically?

    • Who (or which specialisation) performs the eye tracking, data analysis and interpretation?
    • How frequently is eye tracking performed?
    • Which systems are used?
    • Which measures or data are used, and by whom?
    • How is data processed, analysed and interpreted?
    • Are there imitations to, barriers or concerns about eye tracking at present?

2. What guidelines, if any, are used for eye tracking clinically?

    • Where they exist, is there a desire or need to change existing guidelines?
    • Where they don’t exist, is there a desire or need to develop guidelines?

If you have any comments about these – or are able to contribute to the current draft, please do so. 

 

Our next meeting will be sent via google calendar.

 

Thank you.

Best wishes,

Gemma

 


Reply
Posts: 8
(@gemma-arblaster)
Active Member
Joined: 2 years ago

Dear all survey working group members, 

Please find a summary of our meeting actions below. I will circulate via email also.

Best wishes,

Gemma

 

Survey working group meeting – notes and summary of actions

Tuesday 19th Nov 2025

Online (google meet) recorded.

 

Present:

Gemma Arblaster, Rasha Moustafa, Matt Dunn, Fiona Mulvey, Onyeka Amiebenomo, Daniel Goldstone, Fred Shic

 

The survey working group (only) should have access to the following draft documents:

Draft manuscript

Results document 

Survey distributed – for reference

 

Actions:

 

Introduction

1. Introduction has been drafted – critical comments from the working group invited
2. Research questions have been drafted by FM, to be reviewed and finalised by GA considering previous extensive discussions, then checked by OA. 
3. Working group to add any critical comments on these research questions before the next meeting.
4. GA to review survey content to ensure the research questions would be answered by the survey responses, then cross checked by OA

 

Results

5. MD, FM, DG to work on categorisation of responses and analysis of the results

6. MD, FM, DG to look at whether there are sufficient free text responses to analyse, collate, possibly display graphically (wordcloud), or use example quotes to illustrate ‘themes’ or points. Agreed steps:

6a. DG to give data ‘first pass’
6b. DG with FM to come up with list of variables
6c. MD to code the data using these variables 
6d. FM and DG to then check (and cross check) coding is correct – any discrepancies would be discussed and resolved

 

7. Then we would draft the results section – possibly using the research questions as subheadings. So agreed to wait until working group has commented on these (point 3 above) prior to structuring results.

 

Communication with working group:

8. Summary of research questions to be added by GA to ISCET forum (survey subcommittee)
9. Recording of meeting to be sent to Siyuan Chen to be uploaded to ISCET website
10. Continue using google docs for now – but then will generate word doc or LaTex document (possibly using overleaf) for the final version. Acknowledged frustration with google docs for some, but preference to keep everything together for now. 
11. Reminder for the working group to leave comments on google docs with identifying name or to be signed in to google when commenting. 
12. Action for wider ISCET group (possibly later) to discuss file format for future – RM to add this to wider ISCET agenda

 

Date of next meeting:

13. Proposed = Tuesday 13th January 9.30-10.30am UK time. Online via google meet. 

 


Reply
Posts: 8
(@gemma-arblaster)
Active Member
Joined: 2 years ago

Survey working group meeting – notes and summary of actions

 

Tuesday 7th April 2026

Online (google meet) recorded.

 

Present:

Gemma Arblaster

 

Matt Dunn

Fiona Mulvey

Siyuan Chen

Amanda Douglass

Daniel Goldstone

 

Review of previous actions from 24/2/26

 

Section / topic

Action

Status

Results

GA to double check consent and numbers who haven’t agreed to all statements. 

Complete

 

FM to share coding and SC to check coding, once coding is complete (MD/DG/FM)

Complete

 

Graphing and analysing the data (FM/MD/DG/SC)

Complete – for discussion at this meeting

Recording

GA to send recording to SC / MD for upload to ISCET website

Complete

 

Notes from today’s meeting:

 

Working group and authorship framework – from the nystagmus subcommittee. Agreement to suggest these to the survey subgroup and to take these to ISCET.  

 

Discussion about results. Review of Start here ISCET data document.

 

Actions from today’s meeting:

 

  1. Authorship – GA to circulate these to survey working group for consideration. 

 

  1. Group to review and comment on Figures: 
    1. MD and FM will work on comments from working group present at meeting and produce a next version of the Figures
    2. Are there are any Figures that we can remove / omit?
    3. Are there any additional Figures needed? 
    4. Should we display the ‘no response’ or ‘unknown’ data on the Figures? Or is this better within text? 
    5. Figure 14: this is quite a difficult Figure currently, as the data is quite heterogeneous. Should this be separated into eye movements and conditions? 
    6. To give a 2 week deadline for comments on the Figures. 

 

  1. GA to send meeting recording to SC / MD for upload to ISCET website. 

Reply
Page 1 / 2
Share: