ISCET

International Society for Clinical Eye Tracking

Forum

Matt J Dunn · 2025-03-26T13:21:14Z

Hi all, I'm creating this thread as a place to continue the discussion started on March 25th 2025, to determine which standard should be developed first. The Survey study aimed to provide the information to make this decision, and Gemma Arblaster provided this information at the meeting, and will soon be sending round a written summary (which wil eventually be developed into a paper for publication). A couple of points were raised in the meeting which will need to be considered: Although it had previously been assumed that standards would be separated based on specific clinical conditions or clinical subdisciplines, some of the respondents to the survey asked for guidance based on eye movement class (e.g. saccades/pursuit etc). We therefore need to decide how ISCET standards will be organised. I suggest we should compile a 'complete' list/heirarchy of standards before starting work on any individual standard, so that the context is clear. We also discussed whether there should also be general clinical eye tracking guidance (i.e. overarching guidance), in addition to separate, more specific standards. As a reminder: the reason for focusing on a single standard initially (rather than developing several standards in parallel) is to allow ISCET to learn from the development process and ensure that a wide range of views is considered during its development. Inevitably there are likely to be points of disagreement, so it was decided early on that by focusing on a single standard initially, we can refine our methods for collaboration. I should add that I use the terms 'guidance' and 'standards' above interchangeably. - Matt

Notifications

Clear all

Which standard to develop first?

Page 4 / 6 Prev Next

Standards development

Last Post by Ruth Hamilton 12 months ago

28 Posts

21 Users

3 Reactions

14.2 K Views

RSS

Posts: 8

Gemma Arblaster

Jul 23, 2025 1:12 pm

(@gemma-arblaster)

Active Member

Joined: 2 years ago

I am happy to be involved in the nystagmus standards. Thanks, Gemma

Posts: 1

AudreyBonnan

Jul 25, 2025 3:47 pm

(@audreybonnan)

New Member

Joined: 1 year ago

Hello everyone, I would be happy to participate to the development of the Nystagmus guidelines, if appropriate, as a contributor from a manufacturer standpoint. Best, Audrey

Posts: 1

Onyeka

Jul 29, 2025 6:09 pm

(@onyeka)

New Member

Joined: 1 year ago

Hi everyone, I’ll like to contribute to the nystagmus standards development subcommittee. Thanks, Onyeka

Posts: 2

Rebecca

Aug 05, 2025 12:16 pm

(@rebecca)

New Member

Joined: 1 year ago

I also would be very happy to contribute to the nystagmus standards. KR, Rebecca.

Posts: 1

Helena Lee

Aug 05, 2025 1:59 pm

(@helena-lee)

New Member

Joined: 1 year ago

Happy to contribute to the nystagmus standards as an active clinician/NUKE member.

Page 4 / 6 Prev Next

Forum Jump:

Next Topic

5 Forums
18 Topics
66 Posts
1 Online
31 Members

Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts

Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed